Who is the best company to get solar panels from
Tongwei Solar, with its high-purity crystalline silicon and solar cell capacity ranking first in the world for several consecutive years, has achieved a mass-produced module efficiency exceeding 23%.

Best Technology
How to Choose the "Hardcore" Hardware
When choosing solar panels, the first thing to look at is the wafer technology. Currently, the mainstream market has shifted from P-type PERC to N-type technology (such as TOPCon and IBC).
If you install old P-type panels on your roof, the conversion efficiency is usually between 19% and 20.5%.
However, if you switch to SunPower's Maxeon IBC cells, the efficiency can soar to 22.8% or even above 24%.
On the same 50-square-meter roof, this efficiency difference allows an N-type system to install 1.5 kW more capacity.
Next, look at the temperature coefficient. Cheap panels usually have a temperature coefficient of around -0.38%/°C.
If the roof temperature rises to 65°C in summer, the power generation will shrink by about 15%.
Top-tier N-type panels can compress this figure to -0.29%/C.
This item alone can save you 300 to 500 kWh of electricity per year by reducing heat loss.
The degradation rate is also a major factor. Ordinary panels lose 2.5% in the first year and 0.6% every year thereafter.
By the 25th year, the power generation capacity may only be slightly over 80%.
If you look at the high-end series of Maxeon or REC, the first-year degradation is controlled within 1%, and subsequent annual drops are only 0.25%, maintaining 92% performance after 25 years.
This long-term performance means the total 25-year power generation can be 10% to 12% higher than ordinary brands, resulting in an electricity bill savings difference of over $3,000.
Technical Dimension | Top N-type Modules (e.g., IBC/HJT) | Economy P-type Modules (PERC) | Quantified Performance Gap |
Mass Production Efficiency | 22.5% - 24.1% | 19.5% - 21.0% | 15% more power per square meter |
Temp Coefficient (Pmax) | -0.24% to -0.29%/°C | -0.36% to -0.42%/°C | 5.5% more power in high temp |
25-Year Warranted Power | 90.5% - 93.2% | 80.0% - 84.8% | 8% higher long-term asset value |
1st Year Power Degradation | < 1.0% | 2.0% - 3.0% | Higher initial startup power |
Low-light response | 3.5% efficiency boost | Standard performance | 0.5 h more effective daily generation |
How to Configure Inverters
String inverters used to be popular, but if even one panel in a string is blocked by 20% by a tree shadow, the current of the entire string drops to 20%; this is called the "Bucket Effect."
A smarter way now is to install micro-inverters (such as the Enphase IQ8 series) or power optimizers (such as SolarEdge).
Micro-inverters convert DC directly into 240V AC on the back of each panel. Every panel operates independently without interference.
Even if your chimney shades two panels, the remaining 18 will still run at full power.
The total output of such systems in complex shading environments is usually 15% to 22% higher than old-fashioned systems.
Many installers use a smaller inverter to save money—for example, pairing 8 kW of panels with a 6 kW inverter, resulting in a ratio of 1.33.
This causes "clipping" during peak noon sun, wasting 5% to 8% of instantaneous electricity.
A reasonable configuration should keep the loss ratio within 1.2.
The startup voltage of micro-inverters is extremely low, around 22 V.
They start working as soon as the sun peeks out at 6 AM, while string inverters have to wait until the voltage rises above 150 V to "wake up."
This creates a difference in daily generation time of nearly 40 minutes.
System Architecture | Micro-inverters (Enphase, etc.) | String + Optimizers | Pure String Inverters |
Single Point Failure Impact | Only affects 1 panel (5%) | Possible system derating | Entire string fails (100%) |
Design Lifespan | 25 years (sync with modules) | 12 - 15 years | 10 - 12 years |
Installation Voltage Safety | 60V Low Voltage DC | High Voltage DC (lower after opt) | 600V - 1000V High Voltage DC |
Monitoring Granularity | Independent panel monitoring | Independent panel monitoring | String-level monitoring only |
Max Conversion Efficiency | 97.2% | 99.0% (Main Inverter) | 98.5% |
Which Cell to Choose
Tesla Powerwall 3 uses NMC, which has the advantage of small size and high energy density, stuffing 13.5 kWh of capacity into a thin cabinet.
However, if you value lifespan and safety, LFP technology used by Enphase or FranklinWH is more stable.
The cycle life can reach 6,000 to 10,000 times. Even with daily charging and discharging, the capacity will still be 80% after 15 years.
Next, look at the "Depth of Discharge" (DoD). Low-quality batteries only dare to let you use 80% because using more causes damage, while today's top batteries support 100% depth of discharge. If it says 13.5 kWh, you can actually draw 13.5 kWh.
You should also focus on continuous output power. Some batteries have large labels but only 5 kW of continuous output—your AC would overload it immediately.
Powerwall 3's continuous output can reach 11.5 kW, which can handle water pumps with large starting currents.
When calculating costs, look at "Round-trip Efficiency"—how much AC power you get back for every 10 units of DC power charged.
Top systems achieve over 90%. If a system's efficiency is only 80%, you are wasting hundreds of dollars in electricity every year just in conversion losses.
Core Cell Indicators | Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) | Ternary Lithium (NMC) | Budget-grade Storage |
Charge/Discharge Cycles | 6,000 - 10,000 times | 3,000 - 5,000 times | < 2,000 times |
Thermal Runaway Temp | > 600°C (Extremely Safe) | Approx. 200°C | Unstable |
Round-trip Efficiency | 89% - 92% | 85% - 90% | < 80% |
Depth of Discharge (DoD) | 100% | 90% - 95% | 70% - 80% |
Capacity after 10 Years | Approx. 85% | Approx. 70% | < 50% |
Installation Details
Leaking is the biggest fear in roof installation. Professional teams must use "flashing" made of stainless steel or thick aluminum, secured into the roof trusses with M25 self-tapping bolts.
Ordinary teams might just use sealant, which will age and crack in three to five years, causing your ceiling to suffer.
Electrical wiring is also important. Outdoor DC cables must be encased in UV-resistant metal conduits; otherwise, after 8 years of sun exposure, the insulation will become brittle and cause arc flashes, which are the source of fires.
Look at the mounting system: aluminum alloy rails must withstand 140 mph wind gusts, the distance between fixed points should not exceed 48 inches, and a 4-to-6-inch ground clearance must be left for air convection.
If installed flush against tiles, the back temperature of the panels can soar to 80°C, and power efficiency will plummet by 10%.

Best for Efficiency
Comparing Power Generation
Most of the most capable panels on the market have entered the "N-type silicon" era. This material is not as prone to Light Induced Degradation (LID) as old P-type silicon, reducing first-year performance loss from 3% to below 1%.
Taking SunPower's Maxeon 7 series as an example, its mass-produced conversion efficiency has reached 24.1%. In the same 1.7-square-meter size, its rated power can reach 440W to 450W, while ordinary PERC panels may only have 390W to 400W.
This power density increase of over 10% is vital for small roofs with only 40 to 60 square meters of usable area, as it can push total capacity from 8 kW to over 9 kW.
In sunny places like California, this extra 1 kW can contribute about 1,600 kWh annually. At $0.3 per kWh, it saves $480 a year—the price of a used car over ten years.
· Efficiency Ladder:
o Entry-level (PERC): 19.5% - 20.8%
o Mainstream (TOPCon): 21.5% - 22.5%
o Flagship (IBC/HJT): 22.8% - 24.1%
· Space Output Ratio: Installing IBC panels provides about 2.3 kW per 10 square meters, compared to 1.9 kW for ordinary panels.
· Initial Loss: N-type modules have <1.0% first-year degradation, while P-type modules are around 2.0% - 2.5%.
Heat Resistance
Many people don't know that solar panels are actually very afraid of heat. The 25°C standard laboratory environment and the 65°C reality on a roof are completely different things.
The indicator for this performance is the "temperature coefficient," usually expressed in %/°C.
Common products have a temperature coefficient of around -0.38%/°C. For every degree the roof temperature rises, the power shrinks by 0.38%.
When your roof reaches 70°C (45 degrees above standard), the actual output drops by 17.1%.
In contrast, panels using Heterojunction (HJT) technology, such as the REC Alpha series, can achieve -0.24%/°C or lower.
In the same 70°C environment, its power loss is only 10.8%. This 6%+ difference is very valuable during peak summer electricity usage.
If you live in Texas or Nevada, where temperatures exceed 35°C for 100 days a year, choosing such heat-resistant panels will result in 8% to 12% more total power generation over the system's life.
· High Temp Loss (70°C Roof):
o Ordinary modules: 17% - 19% drop
o High-efficiency modules: 10% - 11% drop
· Actual Output Difference: In 40°C air, a 500W high-efficiency panel can output 445W, while a similar ordinary panel only outputs 410W.
· Ventilation Impact: Leaving a 15 cm ground clearance can lower back temperature by 5-8°C, indirectly boosting real-time efficiency by 2%.
Aging Speed
Top-tier efficiency brands usually dare to give a 25-year or even 40-year power guarantee, which is backed by differences in encapsulation processes.
Ordinary panels use plastic backsheets, which can crack and let in moisture over time, causing Potential Induced Degradation (PID).
Current high-efficiency solutions promote "Glass-Glass" structures, where both sides are 2.0 mm tempered glass, providing strong waterproofing and flame resistance.
The annual degradation rate of these panels can be controlled at about 0.25%, leaving 92% power in the 25th year.
Cheap single-glass panels usually have an annual degradation of over 0.55%, leaving only 84% or less by the 25th year.
Although they are 20% cheaper at purchase, when you factor in the 8% lost generation revenue over 25 years, they are actually more expensive.
· Power Warranty Data:
o Power after 25 years (Flagship): >92%
o Power after 25 years (Ordinary): 80% - 84%
· Failure Rate: Glass-Glass modules have a 65% lower rate of micro-cracks and snail trails over 20 years compared to single-glass.
· Long-term Return: For a 10 kW system, a 0.25% vs. 0.6% degradation rate results in about 12,000 kWh more power over 25 years.
Bifacial Generation
If your roof is covered with a light-colored TPO waterproof layer with high reflectivity, the rear-side gain can reach 10% to 15%.
Even with ordinary dark tiles, there can be a 3% to 5% extra gain.
A bifacial module rated at 400W can erupt with an equivalent power of 420W to 440W in actual working environments.
This gain is almost free; you just need to slightly increase the mount angle to increase the light intake at the bottom.
When calculating ROI, this 5% extra gain can shorten your payback period by 6 to 8 months.
Tech Type | Rear Gain (Typical) | Suitable Scene | Efficiency Boost |
Bifacial TOPCon | 5% - 20% | Light roof, tilted mounts | +40W - 80W output |
Monofacial IBC | < 1% | Flush mounts, no reflection | High base but no gain |
Bifacial HJT | 10% - 25% | White ground, high mounts | Extreme output, 500W+ eq. |
Low-Light Performance
High-efficiency panels perform better on rainy days or in the early morning and late evening.
This involves a professional parameter called "spectral response," especially N-type HJT technology, which is better at capturing long-wave infrared and short-wave ultraviolet light.
Ordinary panels are basically in "sleep" mode in the early morning or evening because the voltage cannot reach the inverter's startup threshold.
High-efficiency modules paired with micro-inverters can start supplying the home when light intensity is only 100 W/m².
This "early start, late stop" characteristic provides 30 to 50 minutes more effective generation time daily.
Don't underestimate these minutes; they accumulate to 200 to 300 hours of extra output per year.
· Startup Threshold: High-efficiency micro-inverter systems are approx. 20V, while string systems need 150V - 200V.
· Low Irradiance: At 200 W/m² (cloudy), high-efficiency cells maintain >95% standard efficiency, while ordinary ones drop to 85%.
· Annual Increase: Boost from low-light and spectral response is about 3% - 5% annually.
System Integration
If you use 24% efficiency flagship panels but pair them with a cheap string inverter with only 96% efficiency, plus voltage drop losses from 25-meter thin wires, the final energy reaching the cell or grid may only be 85%.
The professional practice is to choose inverters with over 98% efficiency and strictly control DC-side line loss within 1%.
Best Value
The Payback Account
Currently, the average installation price for residential solar in the US is between $2.6 and $3.3 per watt. A 10 kW system has a total budget of about $26,000 to $33,000.
After deducting the 30% Federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC), the out-of-pocket amount drops to around $18,000 to $23,000.
If your local electricity price is $0.22/kWh and the system generates 14,000 kWh per year, it saves you $3,080 annually.
Dividing the total investment by annual savings, the payback period is usually 6 to 8 years.
Considering the modules have a 25-year life, for the remaining 17 to 19 years, your electricity cost is actually only $0.06 to $0.08 per kWh.
This is much better than the 3%–5% annual price hikes from the grid. Over 25 years, the total net profit can exceed $55,000.
A 10 kW system after 30% subsidy costs ~$20,000, generates ~350,000 kWh over 25 years, meaning the cost per unit of electricity is only $0.057.
Which One is Durable
When choosing panels, the best value among second-tier brands is Tier-1 manufacturers like Jinko or Canadian Solar.
The 420W to 450W monocrystalline modules from these factories may be 30% to 40% cheaper at wholesale than top brands like SunPower, but efficiency remains at around 21%.
Although their degradation rate is slightly higher, with 84% to 86% power remaining after 25 years, the ROI is often 2% to 3% higher than buying top panels when considering the large initial savings.
You need to watch the difference between "product warranty" and "power warranty." A value choice is finding models with 12-15 years of hardware warranty and 25 years of power warranty.
If you control the DC/AC Ratio to around 1.25 (e.g., pairing 12.5 kW of panels with a 10 kW inverter), you can keep the system in the highest efficiency range for 80% of the sunlight hours, avoiding light-load inverter losses.
· Mainstream Tier-1 Prices: Approx. $0.45 - $0.60 per watt (hardware only).
· Degradation Difference: Every 0.1% annual degradation difference causes about 2.5% total power loss over 25 years.
· Hardware Warranty: Choose at least 12 years to cover 90% of early failure risks.
What Size to Choose
Whether you install 5 kW or 10 kW, the design fees, permit fees, and labor travel costs are basically between $4,000 and $6,000.
If you only install 5 kW, these overheads are $1.2/watt; if you install 10 kW, they are only $0.6/watt.
This makes the total per-watt cost of a 10 kW system over 15% cheaper than a 5 kW system.
The most cost-effective plan is to cover 100% to 105% of your annual usage. If your home uses 12,000 kWh a year in a region with 4.5 h of sunlight, an 8.5 kW system is best.
A 5kW system costs about $3.5/W, while 10kW drops to $2.8/W; scale effects save 20% on initial unit price.
Saving "Soft Money"
When buying solar, about 25% of the money goes to installation labor and marketing premiums.
Large companies that advertise on TV and have hundreds of telemarketers charge an extra $0.5 to $1.0 per watt in "marketing fees."
Finding a local installer with over 5 years of experience and good reviews can lower the total price of an 8 kW system by $3,000 to $5,000.
Check if they have NABCEP certification and at least $1 million in liability insurance for potential leaks.
Clearly state in the contract that net metering application fees are included; doing this separately might cost $500.
Also, watch for state-specific subsidies (SRECs). In states like MA or NJ, selling generation credits can bring back $500 to $1,000 in cash annually, shortening the payback by another 1.5 years.
Cost Module | Big Brand Installer (W) | Local Quality Installer (W) | Potential Savings |
Hardware | $0.70 - $0.90 | $0.65 - $0.85 | Approx. 5% |
Marketing & Admin | $0.80 - $1.20 | $0.30 - $0.50 | Approx. 60% |
Installation Labor | $0.60 - $0.80 | $0.50 - $0.70 | Approx. 15% |
Permits & Filing | $0.40 - $0.60 | $0.35 - $0.55 | Approx. 10% |
Est. Total Price | $3.30+ | $2.60 - $2.80 | Save $0.6/Watt |
Don't Waste Maintenance Money
Many people are pushed into professional cleaning services a few times a year, costing $200 to $400 each—this is totally unnecessary for value calculations.
Unless you live next to a dusty farm, normal rainfall will wash away 95% of dust. Dust-related loss is usually only about 3%, which is less than $100 in annual electricity.
Spending $400 to save $100 doesn't make sense mathematically.
You should focus on the stability of the monitoring system. Choose a system with a mobile app and check the curve every 15 minutes.
As long as actual generation hasn't dropped below 15% of theoretical value, don't waste money on maintenance.
The only maintenance worth the money is earmarking $1,500 to $2,500 for a string inverter replacement at year 12-15, or spending 15% more initially for micro-inverters with 25-year warranties to lock in future costs on day one.