How much does 1 solar panel generate a day?
A 350W solar panel (20% efficiency) yields ~1.5kWh/day with 4.5 peak sun hours, varying by region. Clean monthly, align tilt to latitude, and inspect connections to optimize generation.
Power of One Panel
A typical modern residential solar panel, rated at around 400 watts, is a workhorse. In a single day, under decent sunshine, it can generate approximately 1.6 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity. To put that number in perspective, that's enough energy to run your laptop for over 20 hours, keep a modern 55-inch LED TV on for about 13 hours, or power an energy-efficient refrigerator for nearly a full day.
These conditions include a precise cell temperature of 25°C (77°F) and a specific, intense light intensity. Think of the wattage, for example, a 400W panel, as its maximum potential power. However, on your roof, conditions are rarely ideal. The real-world daily energy generation, measured in kilowatt-hours (kWh), is calculated by factoring in the number of hours your panel produces power at that peak level. This is where the concept of "peak sun hours" comes in. It's not just the hours of daylight; it's a simplified measure of the total solar energy received in a day. If your location gets an average of 4.2 peak sun hours, a 400W panel will generate roughly 400 watts x 4.2 hours = 1,680 watt-hours, or 1.68 kWh per day.
The panel's efficiency, which for modern monocrystalline panels typically ranges from 20% to 22%, determines how much of the sun's light it can convert into usable electricity. A higher efficiency rating means you can generate the same amount of power in a smaller physical space. For instance, a 400W panel with 21% efficiency will be slightly smaller than a 400W panel with 19% efficiency.
For every degree Celsius the panel's temperature rises above 25°C, its efficiency can drop by about 0.3% to 0.4%. On a hot, 95°F (35°C) summer day, the panel's surface temperature can easily exceed 65°C (149°F), leading to a power loss of over 15% compared to its STC rating.

Influencing Factors
The real-world daily output of that panel is dictated by a combination of environmental and physical factors that can cause production to swing by 30% or more from the ideal laboratory figure. While a 400-watt panel might be capable of producing 1.6 kWh on a perfect day, the average over a year is what truly matters for your energy budget.
A peak sun hour is defined as one hour during which the sunlight intensity averages 1,000 watts per square meter. A location like Phoenix, Arizona, might enjoy an average of 5.8 peak sun hours per day annually, while a city like Seattle, Washington, might average closer to 3.5 hours. This fundamental difference in solar resources means the exact same 400-watt panel in Phoenix will generate over 65% more energy per year than its counterpart in Seattle, simply due to geography and local weather patterns.
For example, a 400W panel in Phoenix (5.8 sun hours) generates about 2.32 kWh per day, or roughly 847 kWh per year. The same panel in Seattle (3.5 sun hours) generates about 1.4 kWh daily, or approximately 511 kWh annually.
Solar panels are rated at a cell temperature of 25°C (77°F), but on a sunny day, rooftop temperatures can easily reach 65°C (149°F). As temperature increases, the voltage a panel can produce decreases. This is quantified by the panel's temperature coefficient, typically around -0.3% to -0.4% per degree Celsius. On a 35°C (95°F) day, the panel cells might be 50°C above the standard temperature, leading to a power loss of 15-20%.
Even a small shadow from a chimney or tree branch falling on just one of the 60 or 72 cells in a panel can drastically reduce the output of the entire panel. Modern panels use bypass diodes to mitigate this, but losses of 20-40% from partial shading are common. The time of day the shading occurs is also crucial; shading during the 4 hours surrounding solar noon (10 AM to 2 PM) is far more damaging than shading in the early morning or late afternoon, as it blocks the highest-intensity sunlight.
Real-World Example
Consider a homeowner in Denver, Colorado, who installs a single high-quality solar panel on a south-facing roof with a standard 20-degree pitch. The panel is a common residential model rated at 400 watts. Denver experiences an annual average of about 5.2 peak sun hours per day, but this varies dramatically from 2.8 hours in December to over 7.0 hours in June. Over the course of a full year, this single panel will generate approximately 580 to 610 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity.
Month | Avg. Daily Peak Sun Hours | Avg. Daily Panel Output (kWh) | Estimated Monthly Output (kWh) |
January | 3.1 hours | 1.05 kWh | ~ 32 kWh |
February | 3.8 hours | 1.29 kWh | ~ 36 kWh |
March | 4.5 hours | 1.53 kWh | ~ 47 kWh |
April | 5.3 hours | 1.80 kWh | ~ 54 kWh |
May | 6.1 hours | 2.07 kWh | ~ 64 kWh |
June | 7.0 hours | 2.38 kWh | ~ 71 kWh |
July | 6.8 hours | 2.31 kWh | ~ 72 kWh |
August | 6.3 hours | 2.14 kWh | ~ 66 kWh |
September | 5.5 hours | 1.87 kWh | ~ 56 kWh |
October | 4.6 hours | 1.56 kWh | ~ 48 kWh |
November | 3.4 hours | 1.16 kWh | ~ 35 kWh |
December | 2.8 hours | 0.95 kWh | ~ 29 kWh |
Annual Total | 5.2 hours/day avg. | 1.68 kWh/day avg. | ~ 610 kWh |
The panel's output in June is over 2.5 times greater than its output in December. This is a critical consideration for system sizing; you must ensure your system generates enough in the winter to meet your baseload needs, or plan to draw more from the grid during those months.
Several key factors directly impact these numbers in a real-world setting:
l Temperature: On a hot 95°F (35°C) July afternoon, the panel's efficiency can drop by 12-15% due to the temperature coefficient, slightly reducing what could otherwise be peak output.
l Snow Cover: A light dusting of snow may melt or slide off within hours. A heavy snowfall that covers the panel for 2 full days in January would result in a complete loss of about 2 kWh of production for that period, a relatively small impact on the monthly total of 29 kWh.
l Financial Impact: Over a 25-year warranted lifespan, that's $2,287.50 of value per panel, minus any minor maintenance costs. For a typical 2-person household with an annual consumption of 4,800 kWh, you would need a system of about 8-9 panels to cover nearly 100% of their electricity usage, representing a significant reduction in their utility bills.
Improving Your Output
Gains of 5% to 15% are often achievable with minor adjustments and simple maintenance, which can translate to an extra 50 to 150 kWh per year for a typical residential system.
Studies show that regular cleaning can recover 2% to 5% of lost output on average. In particularly dusty or arid climates, or after long dry spells, losses can exceed 7%. The frequency of cleaning depends on your environment:
l Low Dust (e.g., frequent rain): Natural rainfall may be sufficient. Check output monthly.
l Moderate Dust (e.g., suburban areas): A cleaning 1-2 times per year is often adequate.
l High Dust (e.g., near farmland, deserts): Cleaning every 3-4 months may be necessary to maintain peak performance.
Professional cleaning services usually charge $5 to $15 per panel, making it a $150 to $300 service for an average-sized system. The return on investment is clear: for a system that generates $1,500 of electricity annually, a 5% gain from cleaning adds $75 in value, potentially paying for the service cost in one or two cleanings.
For those with a suitable roof layout, optimizing the tilt angle can yield significant returns, especially if your current roof pitch is not ideal for your latitude. The optimal angle changes with the seasons—steeper in winter (latitude +15°) to catch the low sun, and shallower in summer (latitude -15°). If you have a ground-mounted system or an adjustable racking system, you can capitalize on this. Adjusting the tilt angle just twice a year (spring and fall) can boost annual energy production by 3% to 6% compared to a fixed angle set for annual optimization. For a 6 kW system, that's an extra 180 to 360 kWh per year.
Adjustment Strategy | Estimated Annual Gain | Relative Cost & Complexity |
Fixed Mount (Annual Optimal) | Baseline (0%) | Low |
Seasonal Adjustment (2x per year) | +3% to +6% | Medium |
Monthly Adjustment | +5% to +8% | High (Often not cost-effective) |
In a traditional string setup, if one panel is 50% shaded, the output of every panel in that series string can be reduced by a similar amount. With optimizers or microinverters, each panel operates independently. If one panel is shaded, the others continue to operate at their maximum potential. This can reduce energy losses from shading from a potential 20-30% down to just the actual shaded percentage of the affected panel, often 5-10%. The hardware cost for this upgrade is typically $50 to $150 more per panel compared to a string inverter, but the energy yield improvement in a partially shaded environment can lead to a 5-10% higher overall system output, paying back the extra investment over the system's 25-year lifespan.

Common Questions Answered
Even with a solid understanding of the basics, homeowners often have very specific, practical questions about how solar panels perform in real-life situations. These questions usually center on extreme weather, long-term value, and unexpected hurdles. Based on data from thousands of systems, we can move beyond generalizations and provide concrete numbers. For instance, a key concern is how snow cover impacts production, and the answer involves calculating the percentage of annual output generated during summer months versus winter. Another common query involves the true cost and frequency of maintenance over the system's 25-30 year lifespan.
l How much electricity does a 400-watt panel produce on a cloudy day?
l Will a single panel power my entire house?
l Do solar panels work in the snow?
l How often do I need to clean them, and what's the real cost?
l What's the actual payback period on the investment?
A 400-watt panel won't produce 400 watts; its output might fluctuate between 40 and 100 watts. Over the course of a cloudy day with, say, 6 hours of diffuse light, it might generate only 0.3 to 0.6 kWh, compared to the 1.6-2.0 kWh it would produce on a clear day.
A system in Minnesota might produce 60% of its total annual energy between March and September, making winter losses less critical. Regarding weight, panels are designed to handle significant loads. A typical panel can withstand a static load of at least 5,400 Pascals (about 113 pounds per square foot), which is equivalent to a very heavy, wet snowpack.
For most homeowners, rainfall provides adequate cleaning. In areas with moderate pollen or dust, a thorough cleaning once per year is often sufficient. In arid or high-dust environments (near farmland or construction), you might need to clean them every 3-4 months. The cost of a DIY cleaning is essentially zero if you use a soft brush, a squeegee on an extension pole, and water. Professional cleaning services typically charge 5 to 15 per panel.