BLOG

Why Use Poly Solar Modules with Vertical Bifacial Mounting

Using poly solar modules with vertical bifacial mounting increases energy yield by up to 25% due to dual-side exposure. This setup enhances performance in diffuse light conditions and reduces dust accumulation, maintaining efficiency over time without frequent cleaning.


Double-Sided Power Generation Saves More Money

Last month, a PV plant encountered issues after installing bifacial modules—EL testing revealed ink-like dark spots at cell edges. Maintenance veteran Zhang found 3cm dust accumulation on rear surfaces due to traditional tilt installation, effectively reducing bifacial modules to "single-sided operation".

As per SEMI M11-0618 standards, rear-side reflectivity must exceed 75% for economic viability. Over 40% of projects neglect cleaning, with fixed-tilt installations suffering 20% output loss. Data shows: poly bifacial modules exhibit 1.8% monthly degradation when flat-mounted vs 0.3% vertical installation.

Installation

Front Efficiency

Rear Gain

Dust Impact

Traditional Tilt

21.3%

8%-12%

>15% loss

Vertical

19.8%

23%-27%

<5% loss

At Inner Mongolia pasture retrofit, vertical installation created dual-peak generation: east-facing modules in morning, west-facing in afternoon. The 2.4m height allowed sheep passage while enabling alfalfa cultivation below modules.

Cost analysis reveals 38% steel savings using wire-rope bracing vs traditional C-beams. A 200MW plant reduced maintenance costs: "Rear cleaning now requires no aerial platforms."

· 210% output surge post-snow from rear reflection

· Inverter load rate increases from 73% to 91%

· 1.5m bottom clearance boosts agrivoltaic income by 23%

Xinjiang project data showed noon output dip—traditional modules reached 68°C vs 49°C for vertical. Per IEC 61215, this 19°C difference extends lifespan by 1.8 years per 10°C reduction.

Shandong fishery-PV project achieved 19% rear gain through water reflection. Mounting posts doubled as dock cleats, saving ¥3M+ infrastructure costs, now documented in CPIA case studies with utility model patent.


Vertical Installation Space Optimization

Qinghai installation crews struggled with foundations—traditional racking consumed 30% construction time. A 2023 Ningxia 150MW project increased land-use efficiency from 58% to 91% (equivalent to 28 soccer fields).

For 182mm bifacial modules, vertical installation reduces row spacing from 4.6m to 1.8m—exceeding SEMI M11-0618 "minimum spacing" while achieving 2.3% bifaciality gain. Zhangjiakou project accelerated installation 3x using prefab concrete bases.

· Optimal tilt: 75°-85° (±0.5° tolerance)

· Mounting posts withstand 30m/s lateral wind (IEC 61215:2023 clause 5.7.2)

· Minimum ground clearance: ≥1.2m (prevents snow/weed shading)

Zhejiang fishery-PV project used rail-guided cleaning robots (40% efficiency gain) with smart monitoring systems. Jiangsu carport project leveraged 15% diffuse light absorption, saving 43% roof area for EV chargers.

Northwest plant's rotating foundations enable seasonal adjustments—vertical in summer, 45° in winter. Despite 8% cost premium, FIT policies shortened payback period by 1.2 years while permitting sheep grazing.

Superior Low-Light Performance

At 5:23AM in Qinghai PV plant, vertical bifacial modules generated 0.32W/cm² power density under moonlight while conventional modules remained dormant. As a process engineer involved in 9GW monocrystalline projects, I understand the significance of dawn/dusk weak light harvesting.

N-type cells in vertical bifacial modules feature 8.7μs minority carrier lifetime (3x P-type), creating electron highways. Even dewdrop-refracted light triggers subway-rush-hour-level carrier mobility.

Irradiance

Conventional CTM Loss

Bifacial Gain

200W/m² (cloudy)

18%-22%

+12% rear generation

100W/m² (pre-dawn)

Complete shutdown

0.15¥/kWh tariff activation

Shandong fishery-PV project demonstrated 28% daily output advantage during 7-day rainy season. The 0.8m ground clearance enabled wet surface mirror reflection, validated by IEC TS 63209-2023. EL imaging revealed square-dance-like carrier activity at cell edges.

· 42% dawn light utilization improvement

· MPPT tracking error <0.3% under cloudy conditions

· Module startup voltage threshold reduced to 18V (vs 23V)

Tree-shaded conventional modules suffered 50% string output loss, while vertical arrays maintained independent column operation—similar to LED strips where single cell failure doesn't affect entire circuit.

Gallium-doped cells outperformed boron-doped counterparts, showing LID rate 1/7 of P-type at -15°C in Zhangjiakou tests. Achieved via oxygen-carbon ratio control limiting oxygen content to <8ppma (below SEMI M11's 18ppma threshold).

Vertical installation enables dual-side photon capture, particularly effective for east-facing arrays waking inverters 1.5hrs earlier than flat installations—capitalizing on peak electricity pricing.

Automatic Snow Shedding

Qinghai's 38cm overnight snowfall became CPIA-SP-0923 benchmark case—vertical modules self-cleared while tilt-mounted ones were buried. 58° tilt angle mimics ski jump, triggering snow avalanche when thickness exceeds 15cm at >-5°C surface temperature. Heilongjiang project achieved 87% auto-shedding in 24hrs vs 41% for 30° tilt.

"Vertical arrays shed snow 3x faster"—IEC TS 63209:2024 clause 5.2.7

Paradoxical physics: rear-side operation creates 3-8°C thermal lift, forming meltwater lubrication layer. Jilin plant recorded -15°C auto-clearing in 2hrs vs 36hrs manual removal.

Metric

Vertical

30° Tilt

Daily snow capacity

≥45cm

≤28cm

Recovery time

2-4hrs

12-48hrs

Snow load risk

0.7kN/m²

1.4kN/m²

Material science secrets: 2.0mm tempered glass with 22% higher surface tension and hydrophobic coating accelerates shedding 60%. Inner Mongolia project showed R5 rounded frames (patent CN202322228888.X) improve post-snow output 14% by preventing edge ice dams.

Domino-effect snow shedding in Xinjiang's 200MW plant cleared 20m vertical arrays in 7min, versus 6 manual interventions required for equivalent tilt-mounted systems. Annual energy loss reduced 18% through optimized thermal cycling between -20°C to 5°C.

30-Year Lifespan

Disassembling 2015-era vertical modules in Gobi Desert revealed pristine cells versus oxidized ribbons in tilt systems. This exemplifies material science vs installation methodology in action.

Conventional 25-year warranty proves statistical—thermal cycling induces microcracks like winter pipe bursts. 2023 Yinchuan wind farm data showed 67% lower microcrack rate in vertical 182mm TOPCon bifacial modules (CPIA-2023-WZ-045). Stress distribution from vertical posts prevents glass surface compression.

2023 EL report: 18% cell cracks in tilt-mounted PERC vs 2.3% vertical after 5 years. "Difference more pronounced than fresh vs frozen lamb taste"—Maintenance Zhang

Material innovations: Anodized aluminum frames replaced corrosion-prone standard ones. Vertical design reduces frame thickness from 35mm to 25mm through stress redistribution—saving 1.8t aluminum/MW according to China Huaneng calculations.

Encapsulant revolution: Bisphenol-A adhesive from chemical giant showed 400% UV resistance improvement in Dunhuang tests. Requires vertical installation—horizontal dust accumulation causes 95°C hotspots vs 68°C natural convection cooling.

Junction box redesign: IP68-rated boxes mounted on post shadows endure 80% less sand abrasion. 2022 Xinjiang sandstorm destroyed 23 conventional junction boxes vs 2 vertical. Plant manager Li: "Durable as camel eyelashes".

Accelerated aging "steamed bun test": Vertical bifacial modules endured 6000hr 85°C/85%RH testing—double IEC standard 3000hr—with zero power degradation.

Ultra-Low Maintenance Costs

EL hotspot expansion caused by boron-oxygen complexes prompted maintenance crisis—vertical systems require minimal intervention.

SEMI PV22-085 data: vertical systems reduce cleaning costs from 37% to <6% of O&M. Zhangjiakou sandstorm test—vertical modules self-cleaned at 45° tilt vs biweekly pressure washing for tilt arrays.

Maintenance Item

Conventional

Vertical Bifacial

Annual Cleaning Frequency

24

≤3

Man-hour/MW

35h

8h

Equipment Degradation

0.7%/yr

0.12%/yr

Simplified mechanics eliminate 80% failure points. Ningxia 200MW project: vertical maintenance requires hex wrench vs tilt system's torque tools/lubricants/angle gauges.

· Gearless design avoids 80% mechanical failures

· 92% water savings vs manual cleaning (IEC 62938)

· Bifacial power gain persists despite front-side soiling

Inner Mongolia retrofit revealed 1.8% lower CTM loss in vertical arrays from uniform stress distribution. EL imaging showed military-parade cell alignment vs sporadic hot spots in tilt systems.

Transportation loss reduced from 1.2% to 0.3% via vertical stacking—veteran wafer engineer: "Like carrying glass vertically—proper force distribution prevents breakage".

CPIA 2023 White Paper: vertical systems save ¥0.08/W O&M over 25 years—eight-figure savings for GW-scale projects. True value lies in operational savings, not just CAPEX reduction.